Karnataka High Court
Judges : G.K.Govinda Bhat,M.Sadanandaswamy
RANGA VILAS MOTOR TRANSPORT KRISHNAGIRI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE - Respondent
Writ Petn. 298 Of 1968
Decided On : 03/15/1968
Motor Vehicles Act - Plying stage carriages - Section 62, Section 63 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 62 and Section 63 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which govern the grant of temporary permits and counter-signature of permits. The court emphasized that the duration of a temporary permit should be conterminous with the temporary need and that the period is not to be fixed arbitrarily. It concluded that the counter-signature should be for the same period as the temporary permit, and the respondent was in error in not granting the counter-signature for the entire duration of the petitioner's temporary permit.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, carrying on the business of plying stage carriages, sought renewal of a permit and was granted a temporary permit by the Madras Authority. The Mysore State Transport Authority, respondent-2, granted counter-signature on the temporary permit for only a part of the period, leading to the petitioner filing a writ petition for a direction to grant counter-signature for the entire duration of the temporary permit.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Mysore State Transport Authority was in error in not granting the counter-signature for the entire duration of the petitioner's temporary permit and issued a direction to grant counter-signature to the permit of the petitioner to be valid till the expiry of the temporary permit on the 'salem-Bangalore' route.
Issues: The issues involved the grant of counter-signature on a temporary permit for plying stage carriages on an inter-State route and the interpretation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, regarding the duration of temporary permits and counter-signatures.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the duration of a temporary permit should be conterminous with the temporary need, and the counter-signature should be for the same period as the temporary permit, as governed by the provisions of Section 62 and Section 63 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and issued a direction to the Mysore State Transport Authority to grant counter-signature to the permit of the petitioner to be valid till the expiry of the temporary permit on the 'salem-Bangalore' route. No costs were awarded.
( 1 ) THE petitioner is carrying on the business of plying stage carriages on various routes under permits issued by the appropriate authorities under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter called the Act. One such permit issued by the State Transport Authority, Madras, and countersigned by the Mysore State Transport Authority (Respondent-2) was on operate a stage carriage service on the route 'salem to Bangalore, via Dharmapuri, Krishnagiri and Hosur. The said permit was due to expire on 31st December, 1967. The petitioner having applied for its renewal, pending disposal of the said application, the madras State Transport Authority granted on 18th December 1967 a temporary permit to the petitioner for a period of four months, valid from 1st January, 1968 to 30th April, 1968. Respondent-2 to whom the petitioner had applied for counter-signature granted counter-signature on the said temporary permit only for the period from 1st January, 1968 till 15th January, 1968. On 30th December, 1967, the Secretary to the Transport Commissioner, Madras withdrew the temporary permit. Against the said order, petitioner preferred Writ Petn. No. 89 of 1968 in the high Court of Judicature at Madras and in the said writ petition the said order was stayed. The said Writ Petition is at present pending in the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The application of the petitioner for renewal of permit was rejected by the Madras Authority on 8th January, 1968, and against the said order of rejection an appeal having been preferred that matter is now pending before the Appellate Authority in Madras.
( 2 ) PETITIONER approached the 2nd respondent for further extension of the counter-signature on his temporary permit till 30th April, 1968. On the said application, the 2nd respondent has not passed any orders. The petitioner is operating his stage carriage service on the 'salem-Bangalore' route upto the Mysore border on the basis of the aforesaid temporary permit granted by the madras State Transport Authority but is prevented from proceeding to Bangalore because of the failure of respondent-2 to grant counter-signature. Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent-2, on 5th February, 1968, the petitioner filed the above Writ Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India for a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order to the 2nd respondent to make necessary counter-signature on the petitioner's permit valid till 30th April, 1968 or such further period for which the petitioner's temporary permit might be valid and current.
( 3 ) THE facts are not disputed. It was urged by Sri. V. P. Raman, the learned counsel for the petitioner that when the temporary permit on the Inter-State route 'salem to Bangalore' has been granted by the Madras Authority valid for a period of four months from 1st January, 1968 the counter-signing Authority in Mysore State was bound to grant counter-signature, if it decided to do so, for the entire duration of the temporary permit and not for a part of the period of the permit. The submission of the learned counsel, in our opinion, is well founded. A permit granted by the appropriate Authority in one State on an Inter-State route is not valid in the other State unless it is counter-signed by the appropriate Authority in the other State. A temporary permit is granted for a limited period not to exceed four months to authorise the use of a transport vehicle temporarily in any of the four circumstances mentioned in clauses (a) to (d)of Section 62 of the Act. Clause (d) provides for the grant of a temporary permit pending decision on an application for renewal of a permit. In the circumstances warranted by clause (d)of Section 62, the Madras Authority granted a temporary permit on 18th December, 1967 for a period of four months commencing from 1st January 1968. The route 'salem to Bangalore' is an inter-State route. Under Section 62 what is authorised is the grant of a tem
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.