SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Kar) 114

A.R.SOMNATH IYER, AHMED ALI KHAN
MANJUNATHA TYPE RETREADING WORKS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


SOMNATH IYER, J.

( 1 ) THE Additional Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, Mangalore, commenced proceedings against the petitioner who is the proprietor of a business concern which engages in retreading tyres, for the imposition of penalty under section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act on the allegation that he had committed offences under clauses (b) and (d) of section 10 of that Act.

( 2 ) BY an order in which he did not record findings in support of his conclusion, he directed the petitioner to pay a penalty of Rs. 4,628. 50 in respect of the assessment year 1961-62 and a sum of Rs. 5,649. 89 in respect of the year 1962-63.

( 3 ) THERE were two unsuccessful appeals preferred by the petitioner to the Assistant commissioner, and in the further appeals preferred to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal the limited relief which he secured was a reduction in the penalty.

( 4 ) IN these two revision petitions, the petitioner asks us to quash the orders made in that way.

( 5 ) THE petitioner was registered as a dealer under section 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act (which will be referred to as "the Act") and a registration certificate was granted to him under section 7 (4) which authorised
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top