SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Kar) 30

A.NARAYANA PAL, B.VENKATASWAMI
V. K. UCHAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MYSORE – Respondent


NARAYANA PAI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are by the same assessee and relate to two assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62. The Commercial Tax Officer, the original assessing authority, determined his turnover on what is called the best judgment basis. The assessee runs a hotel. The officer therefore estimated his turnover by multiplying his establishment charges by 5. On that basis, he determined his turnover at Rs. 49,018. 30 P. for the year 1960-61 and at Rs. 48,400 for the year 1961-62. He appealed to the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and pleaded that such large turnover could not have been properly and reasonably determined in his case because he has suffered during the relevant years, and also some time prior thereto, heavy losses in business on account of some litigation and that even the Income-tax Authorities had fixed his total turnover only at Rs. 25,000 for each of the years. He stated his case upon affidavit before the deputy Commissioner. The Deputy Commissioner after examining the facts and satisfying himself that the difficulties pleaded by the assessee were genuine, reduced the turnover to Rs. 25,000 of each year. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes has,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top