SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Kar) 115

K.BHIMIAH
MOHAMMED RAHAMATHULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioner is an accused standing trial before the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, bangalore. In this revision petition, he has challenged the order passed by the learned Sessions judge on I. A. No. IV in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 22/1967 holding that the confession statement recorded by the Magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to be hereinafter called the 'code' in not hit by the proviso to Section 13 (3) of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, to be herein after called the 'act'.

( 2 ) THE accused is tried for an offence under Section 3 of the Act. In the course of the trial, the prosecution sought admission of the confession statement recorded by the Magistrate of doddaballapur on 22-3-1965 in evidence. The accused was arrested on 9-9-1965 and was produced before the Magistrate on 10-9-1965. He was remanded to police custody till 23-9-1965. He was produced by the Police before the Magistrate on 20-9-65 with a request to record his confession statement under Section 164 of the Code. The Magistrate remanded the accused to judicial custody till 21-9-1965. When the accused was produced before the magistrate, he felt that it was necessary to record the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top