The admissibility of a confession statement recorded by a Magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the course of inquiry or trial of the accused in relation to offences under the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is an accused standing trial before the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, bangalore. In this revision petition, he has challenged the order passed by the learned Sessions judge on I. A. No. IV in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 22/1967 holding that the confession statement recorded by the Magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to be hereinafter called the 'code' in not hit by the proviso to Section 13 (3) of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, to be herein after called the 'act'.

( 2 ) THE accused is tried for an offence under Section 3 of the Act. In the course of the trial, the prosecution sought admission of the confession statement recorded by the Magistrate of doddaballapur on 22-3-1965 in evidence. The accused was arrested on 9-9-1965 and was produced before the Magistrate on 10-9-1965. He was remanded to police custody till 23-9-1965. He was produced by the Police before the Magistrate on 20-9-65 with a request to record his confession statement under Section 164 of the Code. The Magistrate remanded the accused to judicial custody till 21-9-1965. When the accused was produced before the magistrate, he felt that it was necessary to record the confession in open Court and, therefore, remanded the accused to judicial custody with a direction to produce him on 29-9-1965. The accused was produced before him on that day and he recorded the confession statement in open court. Subsequently, the Central Government accorded sanction to lay complaint against the accused.

( 3 ) THE short question for decision is whether the confession statement recorded by the magistrate under Section 164 of the Code in this case is inadmissible in evidence.

( 4 ) THE answer to this question depends upon the interpretation of the proviso to subsection (3)of Section 13 of the Act. Sec. 13 (3) of the Act reads as under:--

"no Court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act unless upon complaint made by order of, or under authority from the appropriate Government or some officer empowered by the appropriate Government in this behalf; Provided that a person charged with such an offence may be arrested, or a warrant for his arrest may be issued and executed, and any such person may be remanded in custody or on bail, notwithstanding that such complaint has not been made, but no further or other proceedings shall be taken until such complaint has been made".

( 5 ) MR. Devadas contended that the confession recorded by the Magistrate under Section 164 of the Code is hit by the proviso to Section 13 (3) of the Act. His arguments were two-fold. Firstly he argued that a Magistrate is prohibited under the proviso to Section 13 (3) from exercising any general powers under the Code until the complaint is duly made under the Act. Neatly, he argued that if for any reason the Court were to come to conclusion that the Magistrate can exercise general powers under the Code, such Magistrate is prohibited under the proviso to Section 13 (3)from recording a confession under Section 164 of the Code which is a solemn judicial proceeding. There is no merit in the arguments advanced by Sri Devadas.

( 6 ) SRI Devadas emphasised the position of law that express provisions made in a special Act override the general principles laid down in the Code. There is no dispute about this provision of law. This is clear from the provisions of Section 5 (2) of the Code which read as under:

"all offences under any other law shall be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to the same provisions, but subject to any enactment for the time being in force regulating the manner or place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise dealing with such offences".

( 7 ) SRI Devadas invited my attention to Section 11 and 12 of the Act. There is special provision made in the Act with regard to search warrants under Section 11. Section 12 of the Act deals with the powers to arrest and fine cognizable and non-cognizble

Click Here to Read the rest of this document