SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Kar) 72

A.R.SOMNATH IYER, AHMED ALI KHAN
MYSORE SUGAR COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR (STATE CONCILIATION OFFICER) – Respondent


SOMNATH AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) WE are concerned in this writ petition with a settlement reached between an employer called the Mysore Sugar Company which is respondent 2 before us and to which we shall refer as the company, and an employees' association known as the Mysore Sugar Company Employees' association which is respondent 3 and which will be called the association, on 22 July, 1966. This settlement is called in question by the petitioner which is another employees' union known as the Mysore Sugar Company Employees' Union to which we shall refer as the union.

( 2 ) THE impugned settlement was reached between the association and the company in the presence of the State Conciliation Officer who was also the Commissioner of Labour. The settlement was the sequel to a proposal by the company which was announced on 22 June, 1966 to begin a lay-off with effect from 1 July, 1966. That announcement explained that the lay-off became necessary by pressure of external circumstances including the inability to secure raw materials and to find alternative employment for the workmen during the forced shut-down period. The company proposed to maintain only the bare minimum number of workmen requir












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top