SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Kar) 22

M.SANTOSH
N. M. NARAYANA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLAR BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER THE MUNSIFF – Respondent


N. M. NARAYANA SETTY VS. COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLAR BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER THE MUNSIFF

( 1 ) THE petitioner before this Court is the first accused in the Court of the First Class Magistrate kolar, in C. C. No. 1151/63. A complaint was filed by the learned Munsiff of Kolar under Ss. 193, 465 and 467 read with Ss. 34 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and four other accused. The complaint discloses that the petitioner (1st accused in the lower Court)was the judgment-debtor in execution proceedings (Ex Case No. 597/58) for the recovery of Rs. 1,455-7-0 in the Court of the Munsiff Kolar. On 19-12-1958, the petitioner filed an application in the said execution proceedings alleging discharge and produced a forged receipt, Exhibit P-1, in support of the said discharge. Accused 2, 3 and 5 were the attestors to the said receipt. The learned Munsiff came to the conclusion that the receipt and accused 4 was the scribe. The accused gave evidence in Court in support of the said receipt. The learned Munsiff came to the conclusion that the receipt, Exhibit P-1, produced in Court was a forged one and after calling upon the accused to show cause why they should not be prosec









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top