A.R.SOMNATH IYER, AHMED ALI KHAN
K. DORESWAMY IYENGAR – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR ABOLITION OF INAMS, BANGALORE – Respondent
( 2 ) WE are asked to quash the order made by the Deputy Commissioner functioning under the act, made on February 14, 1963 directing the special Amildar, Magadi, to hold a "re-inquiry into the claims of the petitioner and his co-sharers for being registered as occupants under Section 9, and also into the rival claims of respondents 3 to 68. We are also asked to issue a mandamus to respondents 1 to 3 to complete the enquiry expeditiously on the basis of the first report submitted by the Special Tahsildar and to issue a mandamus to respondents 1 and 2 to collect the arrears of rent due to the petitioner and his co-sharers from respondents 3 to 68.
( 3 ) IT is seen from the material before us that there were claims by the inamdars for registration under Section 9 while there were rival claims
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.