SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Kar) 75

N.SREENIVASA RAU, H.HOMBE GOWDA
VASUDEVA RAO (B. K. ) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


NITTOOR SREENIVASA RAU, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition the petitioner seeks that the order of reference made by respondent 1, the state of Mysore, to respondent 2, the labour court at Hubli, of an industrial dispute between the petitioner, who was the employer as proprietor of Prabhat Talkies, Mangalore, and the workmen of Prabhat Talkies, represented by the secretary, Cinema Mazdoor Sangh, Mangalore, in regard to the retrenchment of the employee (respondent 4 ). Kesava Devangha, be quashed as also the award by respondent 2, the labour court, on the reference.

( 2 ) THE reference is attached on the ground that previous to that reference, i. e. , under S. 10 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the State Government had, after receiving the report of the conciliation officer in regard to the very dispute, taken a decision to the effect that the dispute did not merit reference for adjudication, that the decision had been communicated to the parties concerned and that, therefore after having made and communicated a decision, Government had ceased to have any further power to reopen the matter and make a reference. The reference is also challenged on the ground of inordinate d







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top