K.S.HEGDE, T.K.TUKOL
C. S. RATANCHAND – Appellant
Versus
MULTANMULL SESNAMULL – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts necessary for the appreciation of the points in dispute are few and undisputed, one ea Read who was an employee in the Kolar Gold fields and was entitled to Rs. 7,588-3-0 towards his Provident Fund Contribution from the Undertaking, was indebted to the appellant ratanchand as also to the Respondent Multanmur. Multanmull had taken a bond from Read On 1-2-952 creating a charge on his Provident Fund for Rs. 1,626-10-9 with interest. He instituted o. S. 114 of 1952-53 in the court of the Munsiff at Kolar for the recovery of the aforesaid amoun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.