Karnataka High Court
Judges : Ahmed,K.S.Hegde
TOKYO SHIBAURA ELECTRIC CO.LTD.(BY AGENTS RADIO AND ELECTRICALS MFG.CO.LTD. - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE - Respondent
Income-Tax Referred Case 6 Of 1961
Decided On : 03/12/1963
Income-tax - Royalties - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 66(1) - The court discussed the relevant clauses in the agreement between the assessee and REMCO, and concluded that the taxable income of the assessee is the royalty obtained under clause A plus the income-tax paid thereon by REMCO. The court upheld the department's view that the liability of the agent company being only to pay the single point tax on behalf of the principal company, the further tax on tax was the income of the principal company. The decision rests on the true construction of the relevant clauses in the agreement.
Fact of the Case:
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred a question regarding the assessment of royalties received by the assessee during the assessment years 1953-54 to 1957-58. The Income-tax Officer grossed up the royalties and assessed the amounts, which was contested by the assessee.
Finding of the Court:
The court concluded that the taxable income of the assessee is the royalty obtained under clause A plus the income-tax paid thereon by REMCO. The court upheld the department's view that the liability of the agent company being only to pay the single point tax on behalf of the principal company, the further tax on tax was the income of the principal company.
Issues: The main issue was the assessment of royalties received by the assessee and the interpretation of the relevant clauses in the agreement between the assessee and REMCO.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the taxable income of the assessee is the royalty obtained under clause A plus the income-tax paid thereon by REMCO. The court upheld the department's view that the liability of the agent company being only to pay the single point tax on behalf of the principal company, the further tax on tax was the income of the principal company.
Final Decision: The court answered the question in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue, with the assessee to pay the costs.
"whether the assessment of the royalties received by the assessee during the assessment years 1953-54, 1954-55, 1955-56, 1956-57 and 1957-58 at the sums of Rs. 21,271, Rs. 87,379, Rs. 1,63,180, Rs. 2,54,827 and Rs. 2,98,901, respectively, is valid?"
( 2 ) THE learned judge set out the statement of case which ran as follow : there was an agreement entered into on 16th May, 1952, copy whereof is annexed hereunto as annexure "a" and forms part of the case between Messrs. Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "principal company") and the Radio Electricals Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "agent company") under which the latter undertook in India the manufacture of house service meters with the aid of the licences and technical information, data and experience of the principal company aforesaid on certain terms and conditions embodied therein. The following clauses therein relate to the remuneration payable to the "principal company :
"article VII.- A. In addition to the reimbursements and payments elsewhere provided for in this agreement, REMCO agrees to pay to TOSHIBA as consideration for the licences and for the information, data and experience to be furnished hereunder, an amount in any currency acceptable to the Japanese Government equivalent to three per cent. of the net sales billed in rupees by REMCO directly or on its behalf of all watthour meters, as defined herein, manufactured by REMCO with an annual minimum royalty of 9,000 U. S. dollars payable in two equal half yearly instalments of 4,500 U. S. dollars, each not later than sixty (60) days from the end of March and September of each calendar year. . . D. All payments to be made hereunder shall be made in the City of Tokyo, Japan, in any currency acceptable to the Japanese Government with out deductions for taxes or other charges assessed in India, which shall be assumed by REMCO. "
( 3 ) NOTICES were served by the Income-tax Officer on the "agent company" aforesaid as the statutory agent of the non-resident principal (the assessee in this case) for the years ended 31st march, 1953, to 31st March, 1957, the "previous years" for assessment years 1953-54 to 1957-58, which were duly complied with declaring the royalties received for each of the years as its total income.
( 4 ) THE Income-tax Officer, however, grossed up the royalties and assessed the various years as shown belo :
Previous year
Grossed up
Rs .
31-3-1953 1953-54 ? ? 10,702 ? 21,271 31-3-1954 1954-55 ? ? 43,963 ? 87,379 31-3-1955 1955-56 ? ? 77,001 1,63,180 31-3-1956 1956-57 ? 96,353 2,54,827 31-3-1957 1957-58 1,15,077 2,98,901
Assessment year Net royalty Rs .
( 5 ) THE Income-tax Officer's reasons for doing so are as follow :
". . . . . . as the non-resident company has to receive the royalty free of all taxes it is clear that the total income of the assessee company is not merely the net royalty received as declared by their agents, but it is the royalty received plus such sum that, when the tax is levied on the total amount, the net amount left will be the royalty actually received by the assessee company. So I shall gross up the net royalty received and this will be treated as the total income of the assessee company. . . "
( 6 ) IT was contended in the appeals that the assessee filed before the Appellate Assistant commissioner, that in all the aforesaid years the correct assessable income had to be ascertained only by grossing up the net amount with reference to the provisions of the Finance Acts for the relevant assessment years. Copies of the grounds of appeal are collectively annexed hereunto as annexure "c" and forms part of the case.
( 7 ) THE Appellate Assistant Commissioner accepted the assessee's contention and modif
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.