M. SADASIVAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE question which arises in this Criminal Revision Case, is one which has to be decided under Sub-section (1) of Section 185 of the Cr. P. C. The respondent had been committed by the munsiff-Magistrate of Tiplur, to take his trial before the Court of Sessions, Bangalore Division, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code According to the charges which had been framed by the Munsiff-Magistrate, the offence under Section 366 had been committed at Gubehalli of Chikkanaikanahalli Taluk. It is not disputed that the said village in Chaiknai-kanahalli Taluk is within the territorial jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge of Bangalore Division. So tar as the offence, under Section 376 of the I. P. C. was concerned, the charge disclosed that the offence had been committed at tarikera and Peelapura. These two last mentioned places are not within the territorial jurisdiction of the Sessions Court, Bangalore Division, but are within the territorial jurisdiction of the sessions Court, Shimoga Division. The First Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore, before whom the Sessions Case came up for trial, felt that he could not proceed with the trial in so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document