SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Kar) 64

A.NARAYANA PAL
MALKAPPA – Appellant
Versus
PADMANNA – Respondent


A. NARAYANA PAI, J.

( 1 ) THE only point for consideration in this Criminal Revision Petition is whether a criminal court should proceed under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure iu respect of immove-able property which is the subject matter of Civil litigation actually pending in a Civil Court.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute regarding the principal facts in this case. The respondent before me has already filed a suit against the petitioner in which he obtained a temporary injunction on 11-12-1956, which was made absolute on 16-9-1957, Upon appeal by the petitioner against that order, the District Court appears to have passed an order of stay suspending the operation of the trial Court's order dated 16-9-1957 till the disposal of the appeal before the District Court. This stay order was passed on 14-10-1957. On 6-11-57 the police made a report before the munsiff Magistrate of Gulbarga stating that the parties are contending among themselves on the question of possession of the very property which is the subject-matter of the above civil litigation and on the strength of this report the Magistrate made a preliminary order on 27-11-1957 and a final order on 11-3-1958 declaring





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top