SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Kar) 70

AHMED ALI KHAN
RAGHUNATH SHAMRAO ALIAS KRISHNA RAO DESHPANDE – Appellant
Versus
YADAV SAMBHAJI HATTIKAR AND ORS. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 9-4-1958 passed by the District Magistrate, Belgawn, in Criminal Revision Application No. D. C. /mga--4329, setting aside the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Belgaum City dated 30-10-1957 in Criminal Mis. Case No. 4 of 1956. In order to appreciate the arguments advanced, it is necessary to mention the facts of the case which may be briefly stated as follows:

( 2 ) THE houses of the parties are adjacent to each other. It is stated that there are four windows on the second floor and two windows on the third floor of the petitioner's house. The house of the respondents, which is adjacent to the western wall of the petitioner's house, has a low roof and the windows of the petitioner's house are above its level. The petitioner made an application to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Belgaum City under Section 147 Cr. P. C. complaining that the respondents wrongfully and unanthorisedly obstructed the use of the user to the free light and air by scaffolding his windows with tin sheets and has been asked to remove the obstruction and that the Respondents were threatening the petitioner. He alleged

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top