SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Kar) 184

G.K.GOVINDA BHAT, M.K.SRINIVASA IYENGAR
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
HANJARIMAL SAREMALJI – Respondent


SRINIVAS IYENGAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed by the State against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate tribunal, Bangalore, in S. T. A. No. 286 of 1970 dated 23rd May, 1972.

( 2 ) THE Commercial Tax Officer sought to rectify the original assessment that had been made for the year 1964-65 (5th November, 1964, to 24th October, 1965) consequent upon the retrospective amendment of the Central Sales Tax Act and introduction of section 6 (1a ). The assessee would be exempt in respect of inter-State sales of cotton if he was able to show that he had not collect the sales tax as provided under section 10 (1) of the amending Act of 1969.

( 3 ) THE bills produced by the assessee indicated that the price charged was "inclusive of the tax". The bills did not separately mention the Central sales tax. It does not also appear that any amount had been separately credited in the accounts in respect of the sales tax, if any, collected. The commercial Tax Officer was of the opinion that the assessee had failed to establish that he had not collected the sales tax and, accordingly, rectified the assessment. This was confirmed by the deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. On a furth




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top