SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Kar) 179

Karnataka High Court
Judges : E.S.Venkataramiah
LALITA SHIVARAM UBHAYKAR - Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, XII CIRCLE, BANGALORE-9 - Respondent
Writ Petition 1749 Of 1973
Decided On : 08/16/1974
Advocates Appeared :
G.V.SHANTHARAJU, K.SRINIVASAN

The absence of a statutory provision authorizing recovery from a company's director for the arrears of sales tax payable by the company.

Headnote:

Recovery of Sales Tax - Director's Liability - The court quashed the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner, who was a director of a company, for the arrears of sales tax payable by the company, holding that there was no provision in the statute authorizing recovery from a company's director.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a director of a company, was subjected to recovery proceedings for the arrears of sales tax due from the company. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no provision in the statute authorizing recovery of arrears due from a company by proceeding against its director. As a result, the recovery proceedings were quashed, and the respondents were directed to forbear from proceeding against the petitioner for recovering the arrears of sales tax payable by the company. The petitioner was also awarded costs.

Issues: Recovery of sales tax arrears from a company's director, jurisdiction of the sales tax authorities to initiate recovery proceedings against a director.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the absence of a statutory provision allowing recovery from a company's director for the arrears of sales tax payable by the company.

Final Decision: The recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner were quashed, and the respondents were directed to forbear from proceeding against the petitioner for recovering the arrears of sales tax payable by the company. The petitioner was awarded costs.

VENKATARAMIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was a director of a company, namely, M/s. Hi-Precision Engineering Works (P.) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as to company ). The company was a dealer under the Karnataka sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. It was assessed to payment of sales tax under both the Acts in respect of several years. The company committed default in payment of sales tax due from it. The sales tax authorities initiated proceedings to recover the sales tax dues from the company by proceeding against the petitioner who was its director and in the course of the said proceedings, the Tahsildar attached certain properties belonging to the petitioner personally and put them up for sale. Aggrieved by the said recovery proceedings, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. There is no provision in the statute which authorities recovery of arrears due from a company by proceeding against its director. The proceedings are therefore without jurisdiction. They are accordingly quashed. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to forbear from proceeding against the petitioner for recovering the arrears of sales tax payable by M/s. Hi-Precision engineering Works (P.) Ltd. The petitioner is entitled to costs. Advocate's fee Rs. 100.

( 2 ) PETITION allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top