SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Kar) 172

D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR, M.SADANANDASWAMY
A. HARSHA V. RAI – Appellant
Versus
DR. K. V. KARNA AND ORS. – Respondent


SADANANDA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) ONE Harsha sustained injuries as a result of en accident caused by a motor car at about 10. 35 p. m. on 10-2-1965. He filed an application under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs. 50,000/ -. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals, Bangalore, awarded Rs. 6,100/- as special damages and Rs. 10,000/- by way of general damages against the owner of the Car and the Insurance Company. The applicant has come up in appeal M. F. A. 56/170 contending that the amount of compensation awarded is inadequate. The owner of the car and the Insurance Company have filed M. F. A. No. 235/1970 challenging the order of the tribunal and in the alternative contending that the amount awarded by the Tribunal is excessive.

( 2 ) THE Tribunal held that the accident was the result of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the car that the applicant sustained injuries as a result of the accident and that the owner of the car and the Insurance Company are liable to pay the damages of Rs. 16,100/ -.

( 3 ) THE points for determination In this appeal are: Firstly, whether the accident was the result of rash and negligent driving of the driver; Secondly















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top