SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Kar) 106

G.K.GOVINDA BHAT, MOHAMMAD SHARIF
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
BALANOOR TEA AND RUBBER CO. LTD. – Respondent


GOVINDA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THE learned judge set out the statement of the case which ran as follows] - The assessee is a public limited company which owns tea. Coffee and rubber plantations. The assessee further manufactures plastic bags and polythene pipes that are used for spraying, etc. The assessment year is 1966-67 for which the corresponding account year is the year ended March 31, 1966.

( 2 ) THE assessee claimed a deduction of an amount equal to 8% of the profits which were attributable in respect of an activity mentioned in The 5th Schedule to section 80e of the income-tax Act.

( 3 ) THE profits attributable to the business of tea plantation amounted to Rs. 1,18,214. On this amount the assessee claimed a deduction equal to 8%. The relief claimed by the assessee worked out to Rs. 9,457. As against this the Income-tax Officer, however, allowed only a sum of Rs. 5,608. The relief as claimed by the assessee and the relief admissible as per Income-tax Officer is as unde :

Item Appellant's Working Rs . Tea income liable to charge 1,18,214 Les : Relief under section 80e @ 8% ?? 9,457 1,08,757 Les : Loss in plastic business ? 48,105 ? 60,652


The Income-tax officer


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top