SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 140

G.K.GOVINDA BHAT, JAGANNATHA SHETTY
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL DUNGARCHAND AND CO. – Respondent


GOVINDA BHAT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition preferred by the State against the order of the learned Judicial magistrate, First Class I Court, Gadag, in Misc. No. 124 of 1966. The respondents were assessed to sales tax under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957. For the period from 24th October, 1957, to 11th November, 1958, they were assessed to tax. That assessment was challenged before this court in W. P. No. 1235 of 1962 which was allowed and the order of assessment was quashed by order dated 21st August, 1963. Thereafter, the Act was amended by Mysore Act 9 of 1964 published on 27th February, 1964. By the said amendment, the assessment which was quashed by the court was validated. It is stated that the tax assessed was subsequently paid. Proceedings were taken before the learned Magistrate under Section 13 (3) (b) of the Act for recovery of penalty of Rs. 1,840 from the assessee. The said application was dismissed by the learned magistrate on the ground that in the absence of a fresh order of assessment after the Validation act, the Commercial Tax Officer cannot proceed to recover penalty for the period 24th October, 1957, to 11th November, 1958. This view of the learned M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top