K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
H. A. HAJEE ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE said order was made by the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Central Act 10 of 1955) (hereinafter called 'the Act'), read with S. O. No. 1844, dated the 18th of June, 1966 issued by the Government of india. It was made on 13th December, 1971, and published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 14th of December, 1971. It extends to the whole of the State of Karnataka. It provides, among others, for regulating the sale of tyres and tubes of all varieties, issuing of licence and prosecution for contravening the conditions of the licence.
( 3 ) THE petitioners are dealers in tyres and tubes. Their common contention is that the State government have had no power validly delegated by the Central Government under Section 5 of the Act, to provide for the matters in relation to the automobile tyres and tubes.
( 4 ) IN order to examine the contention, it is necessary to have a close look at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.