K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, C.HONNIAH
SHIVARAJVEERAPPA PURAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE petitions raise a common question relating to be the validity of the order made by the principal Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Haveri, under Section 323 of the Code of criminal Procedure.
( 2 ) THE matter arises in this way: the accused were charge-sheeted under Sections 477-A and 420 read with Section 34 of the indian P. C. The learned Magistrate before whom the charge-sheet was filed, committed the accused to the Court of Session to take their trial in view of the gravity of the offences and the maximum punishment that is provided thereunder.
( 3 ) IN our opinion, the learned Magistrate was wholly in error in making the impugned order. Section 323 has no application to the facts of the case. It provides for the committal of a case which ought to be tried by the Court of Session. This is a case which is not exclusively triable by the Court of Session. The maximum punishment provided for each of the offences is 7 years. Section 29 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.