SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Kar) 187

Karnataka High Court
Judges : S.R.Range Gowda,G.N.Sabhahit
STATE OF KARNATAKA - Appellant
Versus
LOBO MEDICALS - Respondent
. . Of .
Decided On : 07/10/1978

Mens rea is not required for the offence under the Essential Commodities Act.

Headnote:

Mens Rea - Essential Commodities Act - Section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the requirement of mens rea in the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, the original notification declaring drugs as an essential commodity under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, and the approval of the price list under para 15 of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1970.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was acquitted for selling drugs at an excess price. The State appealed the acquittal, arguing that mens rea was not required for the offence under the Essential Commodities Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that mens rea was not required for the offence under the Essential Commodities Act, and the prosecution had satisfactorily established the offence against the accused.

Issues: The issues were whether mens rea was required for the offence, whether the original notification declaring drugs as an essential commodity was issued, and whether the price list had the necessary approval of the Central Government.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that mens rea was not required for the offence under the Essential Commodities Act, the original notification declaring drugs as an essential commodity was issued, and the price list had the necessary approval of the Central Government.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the order of acquittal was set aside, and the accused was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a week.

G. N. SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal passed on 29-8-1977 by the ii Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangalore, in C. C. No. 733/1975, on his file acquitting the accused-respondent for an offence punishable under Section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential commodities Act, 1955, read with paragraph 15 of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1970.

( 2 ) THE appeal arises this way : Accused-1 is the firm running under the name and style, M/s. Lobo Medicals, Door No. 102, Ward No. 14, Hampankatta, Mangalore. It trades in drugs holding a valid licence, A-2 is the proprietor of the firm being a qualified person. On 3-10-1972 one of the Drug Inspectors, namely, S. Shantarama Shetty (P. W. 1), inspected the sales premises of accused-1-firm and discovered that under cash bill No. 03279, dated 29-9-1972, the accused sold 6 x 3 M. L. Ampules of Neurobion Merck of batch No. 30271 and 27371 for Rs. 15/- plus the taxes and further that he had sold 3 x 20 tablets of Solerobion under cash bill No. 03325 dated 30-9-1972 for a sum of Rs. 22. 05 plus taxes. On verification from the price-list displayed in the said premises, he found that the accused had collected Rs. 1. 69 in excess for the neurobion Merck ampules and a sum of Re. 0. 60 in excess in respect of the Solerobion tablets sold under the above mentioned receipts. The Drugs Inspector reported the matter to the Drugs controller and after following the required formalities, a complaint was instituted against accused alleging that by collecting excess price in respect of the above mentioned drugs, they committed an offence punishable under Section 3 (2) (c) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, read with para 15 of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1970, punishable under Section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act.

( 3 ) BEFORE framing charge, the learned Magistrate examined S. Shantarama Shetty (P. W. 1), the drugs Inspector, M. S. Kustagi (P. W. 2) another Drugs Inspector and S. H. Anegundi (P. W. 3)who was also a Drugs Inspector. The learned Magistrate being satisfied that there was prima facie case against accused, on the evidence of these three witnesses, framed charge and recorded the plea of the accused so far as the sale of Solerobion tablets are concerned. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Thereafter, the witnesses were cross- examined and the accused was examined under Section 313 of the Cr. P. C. to enable him to explain the circumstances appearing against him. The accused submitted that he collected the excess 0. 44 P. through bona fide mistake and that he had written letters to the concerned customers to take refund of the same. So, according to him, there was no mens rea on his part to commit an offence. The learned Magistrate appreciating the evidence on record found that the accused did carry out the sale as alleged and affirmed by the prosecution witnesses and that he collected about 0. 60 P. more by way of local taxes. But in his view, there was no mens rea on the part of the accused by his judgment and order referred to above. Aggrieved by the said order of acquittal, the State has come up in appeal before this Court.

( 4 ) THE learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State vehemently argued that the learned Magistrate clearly erred in acquitting the accused on the ground that he had no mens rea. He invited our attention to the wording in Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act which read: if any person contravenes, whether knowingly, intentionally or otherwise, any order made under section 3. . . Thus, he submitted that the offence under the Essential Commodities Act as it stood then did not require mens rea on the part of the accused and that it was made a strict liability offence.

( 5 ) AS against that the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-accused strenuously contended that the learned Magistrate was justified in acquitting the accused for the followin









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top