SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Kar) 239

P.P.BOPANNA, D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR
DESAHALLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


CHANDRASHEKHAR, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution have been referred to a Division Bench.

( 2 ) THIS is the second round of litigation challenging amalgamation of cooperative societies. In. these petitions, originally the validity of Karnataka Ordinance No. 2 of 1978 had been impugned. Since that Ordinance has been replaced by the Karnataka Co-operative Societies (Amendment)Act, 1978 (Karnataka Act No. 14 of 1978) (hereinafter, referred to as the Amendment Act), the prayer in most of these petitions, has been amended so as to impugn the validity of the. Amendment Act. In some of these petitions, the constitutionality of Section 14-A of the karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), has also been impugned.

( 3 ) BEFORE dealing with the rival contentions of learned counsel, it is necessary to set out the historical background of the impugned Amendment Act,

( 4 ) AFTER the formation of New State of Mysore (Karnataka) on re-organisation of States, a uniform law governing co-operative societies throughout the new State, was brought about by the Act. Section 14 of the Act provides, inter alia, for voluntary amalgama





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top