SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Kar) 216

Karnataka High Court
Judges : M.Rama Jois
SOMASHEKHAR VEERAPPA B.MURGOD - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA - Respondent
Writ Petn. 8873 Of 1979
Decided On : 10/11/1979
Advocates Appeared :
B.B.MANDAPPA, S.M.BABU

The central legal principle established in the judgment is that belonging to a specific community, as specified in the government order for reservation, entitles an individual to claim selection against reserved seats, regardless of any additional religious or social affiliations.

Headnote:

Kuruhina Setty - Admission to M.B.B.S. Course - Government Order No. ED 44 TGL 77, Bangalore, Dated 18th May, 1977 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the Government Order No. ED 44 TGL 77, Bangalore, Dated 18th May, 1977, which specified the backward communities entitled to reservation, including Kuruhina Setty. The court emphasized that every applicant belonging to Kuruhina Setty community, whether a Lingayat or not, is entitled to claim selection against seats reserved for backward communities. The court highlighted the relevance of the income test prescribed in the government order. The judgment also referenced the evidence and conclusion reached by the Karnataka Backward Classes Commission, which supported the inclusion of Kuruhina Setty community as a backward community.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an applicant for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course, claimed reservation as a Kuruhina Setty, but was rejected by the Selection Committee due to being identified as a Lingayat in the transfer certificate. The petitioner alleged discrimination and filed a writ petition seeking selection for the course.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, despite being a Lingayat, belonged to the Kuruhina Setty community and was entitled to the benefit of reservation as per the Government Order. The Selection Committee erred in rejecting the petitioner's claim based solely on the identification as a Lingayat.

Issues: The main issue was whether a person belonging to the Kuruhina Setty community, even if identified as a Lingayat, is entitled to claim selection against seats reserved for backward communities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that every person belonging to the Kuruhina Setty community, whether a Lingayat or not, is entitled to claim selection against seats reserved for backward communities, subject to the income test prescribed in the government order.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the court directed the Selection Committee to consider the petitioner's claim for selection to the M.B.B.S. Course as against the seats reserved for backward communities. The Selection Committee was instructed to verify the petitioner's community status and, if confirmed as a Kuruhina Setty, to select the petitioner for the course.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition , in which the petitioner who, was an applicant for admission to Ist year m. B. B. S Course in any one of the Medical Colleges in the state has prayed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the Selection committee to select him for Ist year M. B. B. S. Course during the academic year 1979-80 the following question arises for consideration:

"whether such of the, persons who be Kuruhina Setty Community, who had become Lingayats are, entitled to the benefit of special provisions made in favour of educationally and socially backward classes according to which 'kuruhina setty' is declared as one of the Backward communities?"

( 2 ) THE State has constituted a, Selection Committee for the purpose of making selection for admission to Ist Year M. B. B. S Course in Government and Private medical Colleges in the, State. 'the selection Committee called for applications from the eligible candidates for admission to Ist year M. B. B. S. Course during , the. academic year 1979-80. The petitioner being eligible for admission to M. B. B. S. Course submitted his application to the Selection Committee. In the application, the petitioner claimed admission as against seats reserved for Backward, communities as per Government order dated on 18-5-1977, on the basis that he belongs to kuruhina setty, Community, which is one of the. Backward Communities, set out in appendix-I to the said Government Order in which, the State Government directed reservation of seats in favour, of Backward Communities, Backward Castes and special Groups to the extent of 20 per cent,20 per cent and 10 percent respectively along with the application, the petitioner has produced a certificate obtained from the prescribed officer to the effect that the petitioner belongs to Kuruhina setty community which is one of the Back Backward Communities as specified in the Government order dated 18-5-1977. The petitioner was called for interview. He was not selected. . The petitioner found that persons who had secured lower marks than him have been selected as against the seats reserved for Backward communities. Hence, he has presented this writ petition complaining discrimination in the matter of selection for admission to Ist Year m. B. B. S Course.

( 3 ) SRI B. B. Mandappa, learned High Court, Government Pleader, submitted that the Selection committee rejected the, claim of the petitioner for selection as against the seat reserved for Back ward Communities on the ground that the petitioner belongs to Lingayat com as disclosed from, the copy of the transfer certificate produced by him along with the application. Therefore, he submitted that as Lingayat communities is not one of the communities specified in the annexure to the Government order dated 18-5-1977, the Selection Committee was right in rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

( 4 ) AS against this, Sri Prasad learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the petitioner belongs, to Kuruhina Betty Community though, his ancestors had adopted

'veerashaiva or Lingayat in order to substantiate that: the entire Kuruhina Setty Community is a backward community notwithstanding the fact that some of them had become Lingayats, he relied on the report of Karnataka Backward Classes Commission under the Chairmanship of Sri l. G. Havanur on which the Government order is based. The portions of the report on which he relied consists of the evidence given before the commission and the findings and- are found at pages 244, 270, 271, 278 and 279. The relevant portions read as follows:

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE kuruhina SETTY :

B. V, Ramanna, M. A. L. T. , President, south Coorg Kurubina. Setty Association, Bittangala, viraipet Taluk Ex-District Educational Officer, Mangalom Ex-Vice-Principal, College of. Education, Mangalore. In the district of Coorg. the Kuruhina Setty are planters and, agriculturists but in the remaining are" of the State their. Traditional occupation is silk weaving. The criteria menti












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top