SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Kar) 96

K.S.HEGDE, B.M.KALAGATE, H.HOMBE GOWDA
LINGAMMA – Appellant
Versus
PUTTE GOWDA – Respondent


K. S. HEGDE, J.

( 1 ) THE following questions of law are referred by a Bench consisting of the learned Chief Justice and Hombe Gowda, J. , to the Full Bench for decision as per Order dated 12-12-1960:

1. Is the person who files a suit for possession entitled to succeed unless he shows, in addition to title, that he has been in possession of the property within 12 years of the suit?

2. Whether a case, in which it is proved that the plaintiff or his predecessor has not been in possession at all, is governed by Article 142 or Article 144 of the Limitation. Act (to be referred to as the "act" hereinafter)? and

3. When a plaintiff seeks to eject persons from immovable property claimed by him on the ground that although they entered into such property as tenants, were in wrongful possession thereof but fails to prove that the defendants had entered into the property in such permissive character, is he bound to show that he or some of the persons under whom he claims have been in possession of the property within 12 years before suit? These questions are closely interconnected; in fad they are several facets of one question. The questions as referred are abstract questions of law. To decid













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top