SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Kar) 113

MIR IQBAL HUSAIN
BASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SHIVAMMA – Respondent


MIR IQBAL HUSAIN, J.

( 1 ) AN, interesting question as to whether a decree in a partition suit not engrossed on a non-judicial stamp paper could be executed, arises in this appeal. Plaintiff filed a suit O. S. 487 of 1949-50 in the Court of the Munsiff, Nanjangud for partition and possession of half share in the schedule properties, against the defendants, who are respondents before this Court. The suit was ultimately compromised and the compromise decree was passed on 16-2-1950. This decree was not engrossed on a stamp paper. On 14-10-1957, the learned Munsiff ordered the decree to be drawn up on a stamp paper on application I. A. No. 1 filed by the decree-holder and it was so drawn up.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff decree-holder took out several executions to which I will refer a little later, all of which were dismissed excepting the fourth one viz. Ex. 1623 of 57 filed on 29-11-1957. To this last application viz. Ex. 1623/57, filed by the decree-holder, objection was taken by the judgment-debtors viz. respondents 1 and 2 that the execution was barred by limitation. The learned Munsiff held that the execution application was not barred by limitation. On appeal by the judgment-debtors (r





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top