R. P. SETHI, C. J.

( 1 ) AFTER having fought and lost his battle in the State Consumers Disputes Redressal commission, National Consumers' Disputes Redressal Commission, and the Supreme Court, the appellant herein filed a writ petition with prayer for quashing the resolution of the respondent 1 dated 23-3-1982 by which alleged marginal land was allotted in favour of the purchasers of sites bearing Nos. 670 and 671 with a further prayer to direct the respondent to take all appropriate action for marking-out Site No. 669 as per the sketch submitted by the appellant. The learned single Judge considered all aspects of the matter and agreeing with the conclusions arrived at by the State Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the writ petition vide the order impugned in this appeal.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the submissions made by the appellant it is necessary to have a resume of the facts as detailed by him in his petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is submitted by the appellant that on an application made by him to the respondent-authority, the site bearing No. 669 in layout, West of Chord Road, II Stage in the City of Bangalore, was allot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document