SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 364

R.P.SETHI, K.R.PRASADA RAO
KORAMANGALA RESIDENTS VIGILANCE GROUP, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE – Respondent


( 1 ) CONTENDING that the building licence issued for construction of multistoreyed/multi-apartments on Site Nos. 403 and 443 in II and III cross in III Block, Koramangala Layout, Bangalore, was illegal and void, the petitioners, an association of the residents of the area, had prayed for quashing of the licence and for issuance of directions to respondent 1 to demolish the construction already put up on the sites by exercising the powers vested in it under Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (hereinafter called the 'act' ). It was submitted that the residents in the area had acquired sites and built houses upon being made to understand and under the bona fide belief that the layout would be developed and maintained in accordance with law. According to them, the menace of multistoreyed and multi-apartment buildings in the Bangalore City particularly in Koramangala layout which is considered to be a posh and prestigious layout has been increasing. Many property developers, investors in buildings and speculators in real estate were alleged to have started their activities which were detrimental to the quality of life of the residents of the area. Multistorey



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top