H.N.TILHARI, HARI NATH TILHARI
STATE THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GULBARGA – Appellant
Versus
PRABHAKAR – Respondent
( 2 ) PLAINTIFF claimed himself to be P. W. D. Contractor and he alleged that he had been entrusted with the work of repair and tar work of the Chittapur-Malkhed Road from 10. 15 km to 13. 20 km, on the total costs of Rs. 4,00,827-11 Ps. , accordingly there was an agreement. But he could cany out the part of the work amounting to Rs. 91,176/- and stopped further work as per order and the direction of the Chief Engineers. The plaintiff alleged that the aforesaid amount of Rs. 91,176/- was payable on or before February 1993. Under this amount the material worth Rs. 41,000/-, was allotted by defendant 2, at P. W. D. expenses. So after deduction of Rs. 41,000/-, plaintiff claims to be entitled to the sum of Rs. 50,1767-, payable on or before February 1993. Plaintiff alleged that he made several demands, but of no effect, and therefore plaintiff claimed that he is entitled to interest at the rate of 18%
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.