SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 75

K.SREEDHAR RAO
G. GOVINDAPPA BY HIS LRS. – Appellant
Versus
TAYAMMA BY HER LRS. – Respondent


SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal against the judgment and decree dated 28. 9. 99 in RA No. 17/85 on the file of the addl. District Judge, Raichur, arising out of the judgment and decree dated 31. 8. 85 in O. S. No. 171/81 on the file of the Civil Judge, Raichur. For convenient discussion the appellant would be called plaintiffs and the respondents as defendants.

( 2 ) THE appellants are the LRs of the deceased plaintiff, who filed a suit for declaration of title in respect of the suit schedule property and for possession. According to plaintiff his grand father one Narasappa is the propositus. The suit properties are ancestral properties. Propositus died leaving behind two sons by name Basanna and Balayya. Plaintiff is the son of Basanna. The first defendant is the wife of Balayya and the second defendant is the daughter of Balayya. Basanna died in the year 1975. Balayya died in the year 1976. Plaintiff contends that in the year 1939 as per Ex P1 Balayya released his share in the suit property in favour of Basanna. Balayya had no residence and he was financially not well placed, therefore plaintiff's father Basanna permitted balayya to live in the suit house as licensee. When t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top