SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 50

RAM MOHAN REDDY
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. , CITY BRANCH REP. BY THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
KULLEGOWDA S/O NANJEGOWDA AND CHALUVEGOWDA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ram Mohan Reddy, J.

1. The insurer of the offending vehicle aggrieved by the common Judgment and award dated 3.3.32005 in MVC Nos. 74, 75 and 115/97 of the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn) and MACT, Mandya, for short ‘MACT’, has preferred this appeal.

2. The short point for decision making is, whether the MACT in the facts and circumstances of the case having recorded a finding that the claimants were passengers in the goods carriage and not loaders as contended, was justified in fastening liability on the appellant to pay the compensation and to recover the same from the owner by filing Execution Petition?

3. The answer to the above question need not detain the Court for long. The Apex Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani 2003 ACJ 1 followed by the Judgment in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vedawathi and Anr. 2007(3) Scale 397 held that the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not enjoin statutory liability on the owner of the motor vehicle to get his vehicle insured for any passengers travelling in a goods carriage and the insurer would have no liability thereof. Applying the very same principles to the facts of this case in respect of an accident that occurred on 19.5.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top