Kumar, J.

This is a defendant’s Regular First Appeal.

2. This appeal along with other six connected appeals were heard by this Court and by a common order dated 15.4.1999 they were allowed and the suit of the plaintiff was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said common judgment and decree dated 15.4.1999 the aggrieved persons, preferred Special Leave Petition to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In the Supreme Court, the counsel for the parties agreed for setting aside the impugned judgment of this Court and remitting the appeals to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law. Accordingly, the judgment, and decree passed by this Court on 15.4.1999 was set aside and the appeals were remitted back to this Court for fresh decision in accordance with law with a request to dispose of the appeals as expeditiously as possible. It is thereafter, this appeal is heard along with other six connected appeals. Though the parties are different, the question of law involved in all these appeals are one and the same. For a proper appreciation of the legal issues all the advocates appearing in these appeals were heard and the legal issues have been answered. However, as the factual