SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 209

S.ABDUL NAZEER
SRI S. GANGADHAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SRI R. PRAKASH – Respondent


ORDER

Abdul Nazeer, J

The unsuccessful defendants have filed this appeal challenging the judgment and decree in O.S. No.1068/1997 dated 23.08.2007 passed by the 11th Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore City. The respondent was the plaintiff in the suit.

2. The plaintiff had filed the aforesaid suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Along with the plaint, he had filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure for grant of temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property pending disposal of the suit.

3. It is the case of the plaintiff that the court below had passed the order on 06.02.1997 directing the parties to maintain status quo regarding possession of the suit schedule property. After service of the notice, the defendants have filed their written statement and I.A.2 under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure requesting the court below to take appropriate action against the plaintiff for violating the interim order dated 06.02.1997. The court belo












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top