SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 158

N.K.PATIL
Honnurappa – Appellant
Versus
R. Masthan – Respondent


Advocates appearing for:
Petitioner: M/s. Kolar and Kolar, Adv.

ORDER

Patil, J.

The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order dated 23-6-2007 passed in Civil Misc. No. Nil/2005 by the I Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) & JMFC Hospet, has presented the instant Civil Revision Petition.

2. Along with the instant revision petition, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner has filed I.A. No. I of 2007 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 36 days in filing the instant revision petiton. The said delay has been explained by the petitioner in Para-4 of the affidavit dated 6-11-2007 filed along with the application stating that, he was informed by his Counsel in the last week of June 2007 that the miscellaneous petiton filed by him was rejected on 23-6-2007 and he has applied for a certified copy of the same on the same day and informed him to come over to Hospet immediately to instruct whether if he wants to challenge the order passed by Court below. Further, he has stated that, petitioner learnt that he has 90 days time to approach this Court and in the meanwhile due to heavy rain in Mumbai and the conditions prevalent in the place where he was residing, he fell very sick and was bedridden from 20.9.2007 and he was diagnosed



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top