A.S.BOPANNA
K. N. Kamalamma – Appellant
Versus
Bangalore Development Authority – Respondent
(This review petition filed under order 47 rule 1 of CPC praying for review of the Order/Judgment and decree dated 16.2002 passed in W.P. No.36418/97.)
Heard Sri C.B. Srinivasan, learned senior counsel on behalf of Sri Rameshchandra, learned counsel, Sri T.N. Raghupathy and Sri M.R. Rajagopal, learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners, and sri K. Krishna, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. As common questions of law on similar facts are involved in the aforesaid matters, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order. These petitioners had filed three connected writ petitions in this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India with a prayer to quash the notices dated 12.1997 and 12.1997 marked as Annexure – B and D respectively issued by the respondent/Bangalore Development Authority (‘the EDA’ for short). The further prayer was made for issuance of writ of mandamus for considering the case of the petitioners for reallotment/reconveyance of sites. The aforesaid petitions were consolidated for hearing and by a common order the matter came to be disposed of by a common order the matter came to be disposed of by a Divis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.