ANAND BYRAREDDY
ASHA CHAKKO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Heard the Counsel for the parties.
2. The facts are as follows.-
A portion of land consisting of buildings, stables and garden collectively called 'Beaulieu' measuring 24 acres and 12 guntas, was owned by one Sri Lancelot Ricketts and was sold by him under a registered deed of conveyance, dated 25-8-1900, for a sum of Rs. 60,000/in favour of the Dewan of Mysore which was said to be a purchase by him on behalf of the Princess Jayalakshmammanni Avaru of Mysore. It is stated that the sale deed, after registration, was transferred to the princess' estate and lodged in the Palace Treasury for safe custody. The consideration amount was said to be paid from the first princess' account and the amount was debited from her pension account due to her for the year 1900-1901. The consideration therefore was not paid by the Government of Mysore or by his Highness the Maharaja, personally. Thus, it is urged, the property 'Beaulieu' was the personal property of Princess Jayalakshmammanni Avaru.
This is stated to be further evidenced by the circumstance that the then Public Works Department of the Government of Mysore, which had encroached upon the property in the year 1918, had even paid compens
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.