AJIT J.GUNJAL
A. BHAGYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE – Respondent
Site bearing No. 256 ad measuring 20' x 25' of Sonnenahalli further extension, Bangalore was allotted in favour of one Abdul Aleem. A lease-cum-sale agreement was also executed on 2nd February, 1988. He was also put in possession pursuant to a Possession Certificate dated 23-4-1988.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the said Abdul Aleem was in financial difficulty and offered to sell the property to the 2nd petitioner i.e., the husband of the 1st petitioner on 19-2-1988 for a consideration. He received more than 80% of the sale consideration on the date of execution of the sale agreement. He has also put the purchaser in possession of the schedule property and has delivered all the original documents issued by the respondent to the said Abdul Aleem. The balance of sale consideration was also paid. Hence, Abdul Aleem executed a registered General Power of Attorney on 28-4-1988 appointing the 2nd petitioner as his lawful attorney to deal with the schedule property, including transfer. The copy of the General Power of Attorney is at Annexure-B. The 2nd petitioner applied and obtained the building plan and has put up a construction and has been residing there with petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.