SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 468

A.S.BOPANNA
Narasingh – Appellant
Versus
K. Basavaraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:B.V. Rama Moorthy, Advocte. For the Respondent:T.S. Mahantesh, Mahesh S., Advocates.

Judgment :-

A.S. Bopanna, J.

This is the second round of litigation between the parties before this Court. The plaintiff in O.S.No.16316/2005 is the appellant. The plaintiff is before the Court below seeking for a judgment and decree of permanent injunction claiming to be the owner of the property bearing site No.3 formed in Sy.No.7/3A of Chikkbettahalli, Yelahanka Hobli; Bangalore North Taluk. In aid of the said prayer, the plaintiff also filed an application 1A.1 seeking an order of temporary injunction restraining the defendant from dispossessing him from peaceful possession and employment of the scheduled property.

2. The defendant who appeared on notice had disputed the claim of the plaintiff. Ultimately the issue which remains to be adjudicated by the Court below is as to whether actually the plaintiff had retained any portion in site No.3 formed in Sy.No.7/3A or as to whether the property to which the claim is laid by the plaintiff is some other property other than the property which was purchased by the defendant. This itself would indicate that there is a serious dispute with regard to the identity of the property. In that background, the Court below has referred to the con




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top