S.ABDUL NAZEER
B. H. Narayanaswamy, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Represented. By its Managing Director – Respondent
Though these matters are posted in the orders list, by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final hearing.
2. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and respondent Nos.1 and 2 are common in both the writ petitions. The third petitioner in W.P.No.367/2007 has not been made a party in W.P.No.10504/2007. The Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate, Bangalore District has been made the third respondent in W.P.No.10504/2007. The basic facts leading to filing of these writ petitions are common. Most of the documents produced in both the writ petitions are also common. Therefore, both the writ petitions are clubbed together, heard and disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the documents marked in W.P.No.10504/2007 are referred to in the course of this order.
3. The first petitioner is the owner of land bearing Sy.No.91 measuring 2 acre 30 guntas, Sy.No.109/3B measuring 20 guntas, Sy.No.91 measuring 1 acre 4 guntas of Kumbalagodu village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. Petitioner No.2 is the owner of land bearing Sy.No.110/3 measuring 10 guntas, Sy.No.110/6 measuring 24 guntas and Sy.No.110/4 measuring 0.09 guntas, Sy.No.110/5 measuri
Gajraj Singh and Others Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Others
A. Umarani Vs. Registrar, Co operative Societies and Others
Babu Verghese and Others Vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Others
M.T. Khan and Others Vs. Government of A.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.