K.BHAKTHAVATSALA
Michael J Brito – Appellant
Versus
John Emanuel Lawerence Brito Since Dead by LR Gracy Brito – Respondent
These W.Ps. Filed Praying To Quash The Impugned Order At ANX-L Dt. 05.02.2010 Passed INOS 8412/1997 By The Additional City Civil Judge Bangalore (CCH No. 9) Allowing The 4 Applications Dt. 27.01.2010 Filed By Respondent No. 1/Plaintiff And Consequently Dismiss All The 4 Applications.
1. The petitioners/defendant nos. 1 to 3 in O.S. No. 8412/1997 on the file of Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, (CCH-9) are before this court praying for quashing the common order dated 5.2.2010 passed on four applications filed in the above said suit at Annexure-L.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that DW-1 was examined on commission long back. Thereafter DW-2 was also examined. At the stage of arguments, counsel for the LR of plaintiff filed two applications as per Annexures-C and D both under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC to recall DW-1 and DW-2 for further cross-examination. Applications as per Annexures-G and j were also filed under Section 151 of CPC to recall the orders dated 28.7.2007 and 18.11.2009, and to re-open the case and permit the plaintiff to cross-examine DW-1 and DW-2. All the four applications were opposed by filing objections. The trial court has passed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.