SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 661

A.S.BOPANNA
R. Nagaraj – Appellant
Versus
Sri Brahmatantra Swathanthra Parakala Mutt, Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri B.V. Rama Moorthy, for Petitioner.

ORDER

A.S. Bopanna, J: The petitioner is calling in question the order dated 22.9.2008 passed on I.A.No.V in Mis. No. 1030/2006. The said order is impugned at Annexure-E to the petition.

2. I have heard Sri B.V. Ramamoorthy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and have perused the writ papers including the order impugned in this petition.

3. The petitioner herein is the petitioner in Mis. No. 1030/2006. The said miscellaneous petition is filed under Order IX, Rule 13 read with Section 151 of CPC. The respondents indicated in the miscellaneous petition have entered appearance and filed their written statement. Subsequently, the present application in I.A. No. V is filed under Order VIII, Rule I-A reed with Section 131 of whereunder general power of attorney dated 25.8.2008 and the certified copy of the order sheet in O.S. No. 31/96 were filed with leave to file the same before the Court. The petitioner in the said miscellaneous petition i.e.; the petitioner in this petition objected to the same. The Trial Court after considering the same has allowed the application and has taken the documents on record. The petitioner claims to be aggrieved by the said order.

4. On behalf of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top