SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Kar) 815

H.G.RAMESH
K. Narasimhan – Appellant
Versus
Rohini Devanathan – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:
For the Petitioners:A.H. Bhagavan, A.N. Radhakrishna, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Balagangadhar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J.

The petitioner has sought for quashing the proceedings against him in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1445/2008 pending before the VIII Additional CMM, Bangalore.

2. The respondent filed a complaint under Section 12 of the protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act against her husband and the petitioner who is her brother-in-law making certain allegations so as to attract the provisions of Section 3 of the Act. The learned Magistrate based on the said complaint, ordered to register the case and to issue summons, as against which, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for quashing the proceedings on various grounds.

3. As it transpires, the first accused was in search of a girl and contacted the respondent under the matrimonial website i.e. Shadi.com and on 23-2-2004, they got married after negotiation. After marriage, the first accused left for Canada during March 2004 and was residing there. It appears, on 1st August, 2004, the respondent also joined her husband. Thereafter, differences arose between the couple and they started residing separately since May 2007. The respondent also is said to have given an advertisement in matrimonial website









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top