In this case, the petitioner has called in question the validity of the Order No. 38/ADMN/2010, dated 10-3-2010 (Annexure-B) passed by the District and Sessions Court, Koppal, transferring O.S. No. 193 of 1992 on the file of the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Koppal, to the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gangavathi, for disposal in accordance with law.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the above suit and the respondent is the defendant. The petitioner contends that the learned Counsel for the plaintiff concluded his arguments on 21-1-2010 and the learned Counsel for the defendant concluded his arguments on 23-2-2010. On 25-2-2010, Counsel for the plaintiff submitted his reply and the matter was posted for judgment on 12-3-2010. On the said date, instead of pronouncing the judgment, the Trial Court has directed the office to send the records of the case to the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gangavathi, in terms of the order at Annexure-B passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Kappal.

3. Sri Jayavittal Rao Kolar, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner contends that learned Counsel for the petit