A.RAJU NAGARAJ
KAMAKSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The accused in C.C. No. 22406 of 1997 on the file of the learned X ACMM, Bangalore City, Bangalore which subsequently came to be renumbered as C.C. No. 14544 of 1999 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, I Traffic Court, Bangalore City, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as "Trial Court" for short) has challenged in this revision the legality and correctness of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 28-7-2000 passed in the said case convicting her for the offence under Section 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as "Prize Chits Act" for short). She has also challenged in this revision the correctness of the judgment and order dated 20-7-2006 passed in Cri.A. No. 15096 of 2000 on the file of the learned XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as "Appellate Court" for short) confirming the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court.
2. Heard the arguments of Sri Amaresh A. Angadi, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner-accused and Sri Vijayakumar Majage, the learned High Court Government Pleader. Perused both the impugned ju
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.