ARAVIND KUMAR
MUMTAZ – Appellant
Versus
PUTTARAJU (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS L. Rs – Respondent
In this revision petition, respondent is questioning the correctness and legality of the order passed in HRC No. 179 of 2007, dated 10-112009 on the file of the XI Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore.
2. The facts in nutshell are as follows:
Respondent herein initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in HRC No. 179 of 2007 under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. It was contended in the eviction petition that they purchased the property bearing No. 72, assessment No. 133 K No. 710 Laggere Village, Yeshwanthapura Hobli. Measuring East to West 30 North to South 50 wherein the petition schedule premises is situated under sale deed dated 19-6-2006 from one Sri Anthony Raj. Subsequent to the purchase khatha has also been transferred to their name and they have been paying taxes.
3. It was further contended subsequent to the purchase the respondent was informed about the purchase of the property and on the understanding that respondent has agreed to continue revision petitioner as a tenant of the schedule premises where under it was agreed that respondent-tenant would pay rent of Rs. 300/- per month within 15th of every month tenancy was co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.