SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 1027

High Court of Karnataka
Writ Petition No. 34523 of 2010 (GM-RES)
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR
S.Y. Jotrannavar Section Officer, Decree Appeal Branch High Court of Karnataka Bangalore
Versus
The State of Karnataka Department of Public Works, Vidhana Soudha, Rep. by its Secretary & Others
Decided on : 22-11-2010

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N.M. Karadigudda, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Sangamesh G. Patil, AGA.

The relevant rules governing the allotment of government quarters dictate the payment obligations of the allottee, and any demand for charges beyond those specified in the rules must be justified.

Headnote:

sanitary charges - Government Quarters - Karnataka Government (Allotment of Government Quarters) Rules 1999 - Rule 5, Rule 9, Rule 19

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a government employee, sought to surrender the keys of a government quarter without paying outstanding sanitary charges. The respondent refused to accept the keys unless the petitioner paid the sanitary charges.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had paid all other charges and was not required to pay sanitary charges as per the Karnataka Government (Allotment of Government Quarters) Rules 1999. The court quashed the demand for sanitary charges and directed the respondent to accept the keys and refund the deducted licence fee and water charges.

Issues: Dispute over the payment of outstanding sanitary charges for a government quarter and the refusal to accept the keys without payment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was not required to pay sanitary charges as per the relevant rules and that the demand for such payment was not justified. The court also ruled that the deduction of licence fee and water charges after the petitioner vacated the quarter was not justified for the month of October 2010.

Final Decision: The court quashed the demand for sanitary charges, directed the respondent to accept the keys, and ordered the refund of deducted licence fee and water charges. It also prohibited the recovery of licence fee and water charges from the petitioner's salary in the future.

Judgment

This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R2 without insisting to payment of outstanding arrears of sanitary charges pending since 10 years i.e., Rs. 11,620/- and direct to receive the key of the P.W.D. quarters No. 255/11, Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore and to issue no due certificate and further direct the R2 issue letter to R4 to stop the recovery of licence fee and water charges from 1st November 2010 onwards from the salary of the petitioner and etc.,

Petitioner has sought for a direction to the 2nd respondent to receive the keys of PWD quarters No. 255/1, Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore, without insisting to pay the outstanding arrears of sanitary charges amounting to Rs. 11,620/-. Certain other reliefs are also sought for in the writ petition.

2. Petitioner is a Section Officer working in the High Court of Karnataka. He was

quarters bearing No. 255/11, situated at Yelahanka New Town, on 18.5.1995. Subsequently, the petitioner seems to have constructed the house and has shifted to the new house of his own. Thus, the petitioner with a view to surrender the keys of the quarters, approached the 2nd respondent and requested him to accept the keys of the quarters. At the time of surrendering the keys of the quarters i.e., on 16.9.2010, the petitioner had paid the entire water charges and electricity charges in respect of the quarters in question till 16.9.2010 as is clear from the documents vide Annexures –‘A’ and ‘D’. The water charges were being deducted every month from the salary of the petitioner. Thus, it is clear that the petitioner has paid licence fee, water charges and electricity charges completely as on 16.9.2010. However, the 2nd respondent refused to accept the keys surrendered by the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner has to pay Rs. 11,620/- towards sanitary charges by issuing letter/order Annexure – ‘B’ dated 19.10.2010. Hence, this writ petition is filed praying for necessary direction. It is also relevant to note that the water charges and licence fee for the quarters is deducted from the salary of the petitioner for the months of September and October 2010 also. The petitioner has sought for refund of such recovered amount also.

3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has paid the licence fees, water charges and electricity charges fully in respect of the quarters in question till 19th September 2010. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner requested the respondents to permit the petitioner to surrender the keys of the quarters on 19.9.2010. But, the same is refused by the 2nd respondent on the ground that the petitioner is due for a sum of Rs. 11,620/- towards drainage/sewerage charges.

4. The allotment of quarters for government employees is covered by the Karnataka Government (Allotment of Government Quarters) Rules 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’ for short). Rule 5 of the Rules deals with eligibility for allotment of the PWD quarters. The petitioner was allotted quarters as he was eligible for allotment. Such allotment is subject to the provisions contained in Rule 9 of the Rules. Rule 9 of the Rules deals with payment of licence fee. As could be seen from Rule 9 of the Rules, the licence fee payable shall be 10% on the gross monthly salary of the allotee or the amount equal to HRA, whichever is more. In the matter on hand, the amount equal to HRA is deducted from the salary of the petitioner every month towards licence fee. Thus, Rule 9 of the Rules is satisfied by the petitioner. Rule 19 of the Rules deals with upkeeping of the house. The said rule mandates that the allottee while in occupation of the house quarters, shall be responsible for the proper upkeep and maintenance of the house/quarters and is liable for damage caused to the building, if any. The allottee shall take care to see that all the bills in respect of supply of electricity and water to the house/quarters are cleared from the month to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top