R.B.NAIK
Chandrashekharappa – Appellant
Versus
Sharanabasappa – Respondent
1. The order of issue of process for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is challenged in the present petition on the ground that the complaint is presented by the power of attorney holder and he has stepped into the witness-box and has given sworn statement and on the basis of the averments in the compliant and the sworn statement and the material made available, the learned Magistrate directed issue of process.
2. Having regard to the said facts, the points that arise for my consideration in the present petition are:
1. Whether a power of attorney holder can present a complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?
2. Whether the power of attorney holder can prosecute the criminal Proceedings without permission under Section 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
3. The first point need not detain me long since it is already held by me in the case of Om Shakthi Scheuled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Minority Credit Co-operative Society Limited v M. Venkatesh (2008(2) Kar. L.J. 486: 2008(1) AIR Kar. R. 311), that a power of attorney holder can present a complaint.
4. As regards the second point in the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.