SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 826

ANAND BYRAREDDY
Eranna – Appellant
Versus
Sabjamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Shivakumar Kalloor for Petitioner.

ORDER

Anand Byrareddy, J : The petition coming on for preliminary hearing, the petition is considered for final disposal, having regard to the fact that the respondents are served and are un-represented and given the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. The facts briefly narrated are as follows:

The petitioner claims to be in possession of land in Survey No. 67/B, measuring 4 acres, of Hirekotnekal village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District and that he has been cultivating the same for over 20 years. He was cultivating the land on share basis under respondent No. 3 and before under her husband, who had died earlier. Respondent No. 3 alongwith respondent Nos. 4 to 6, had sold the land to respondent No. 2, who was a minor at that time, through his mother. They had then migrated to another village and the petitioner was permitted to continue cultivation. On attaining majority, the second respondent entered into an agreement to sell the suit property to the petitioner for a consideration of Rs. 2.40 lakh and had received an advance consideration of Rs. 1.00 lakh. The petitioner was permitted to continue to cultivate the land. The petitioner claims to have paid the entire sale amount to the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top