SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Kar) 94

High Court of Karnataka
N. KUMAR & RAVI MALIMATH
The Commissioner of Income Tax, C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bangalore & Others
Versus
M/s. Millipore India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
ITA.NOS. 674 of 2007 C/W 3213 of 2005, 139 of 2007, 137 of 2007, 154 of 2007, 155 of 2007, 156 of 2007, 1086 of 2006, 87 of 2010, 379 of 2008, 109 of 2007, 216 of 2008, 73 of 2006, 75 of 2006, 36 of 2007, 62 of 2007, 234 of 2009, 704 of 2008, 227 of 2009, 429 of 2008, 165 of 2008, 54 of 2008, 64 of 2007 & 113 of 2010
Decided on: 03-02-2011

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.V. Aravind, Smt. Veena Jadhav, M/s. King & Partridge, Smt. K.K.Chythanya, S. Parthasarathy, Advocates.
For the Respondent:A. Shankar & Lava, Lava, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions under the heading 'C-Deductions in respect of certain incomes' are independent of each other, allowing a new industrial unit to claim deductions under both Section 80-HHC and Section 80-I on the gross total income independently.

Headnote:

Section 801B - Section 80 HHC - [Section 801B, Section 80 HHC] - The court considered the deductions claimed by the assesses under Section 801B and Section 80 HHC. The key legal provisions discussed were Section 801A (9) and Section 801B (13), which set limitations on the eligibility of deductions under the heading 'C-Deductions in respect of certain incomes'. The court interpreted these provisions to restrict the total deductions under Chapter VI-A to the total profits and gains of the eligible business. The court also analyzed the computation of profits and gains of export business under Section 80HHC and emphasized that deductions claimed under Section 801A should be restricted to the profits and gains arrived at after making the claims under the relevant sections.

Fact of the Case:

The revenue appealed the tribunal's order upholding the deductions claimed by the assesses under Section 801B and Section 80 HHC. The court considered the question of law regarding the deduction of profits and gains of an undertaking under Section 801A and its impact on the computation of profits and gains under Section 80HHC. The court analyzed the facts of one case where the assessing officer had not reduced the deductions allowable under Section 801B before computing the deductions admissible under Section 80HHC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deductions claimed under Section 801A should be restricted to the profits and gains arrived at after making the claims under the relevant sections. It also held that the provisions under the heading 'C-Deductions in respect of certain incomes' are independent of each other, and a new industrial unit can claim deductions under both Section 80-HHC and Section 80-I on the gross total income independently.

Issues: The key issue was whether the deductions claimed under Section 801A should be deducted before or after the computation of profits and gains under Section 80HHC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the key legal provisions, Section 801A (9) and Section 801B (13), to restrict the total deductions under Chapter VI-A to the total profits and gains of the eligible business. It also emphasized that the provisions under the heading 'C-Deductions in respect of certain incomes' are independent of each other, allowing a new industrial unit to claim deductions under both Section 80-HHC and Section 80-I on the gross total income independently.

Final Decision: The court dismissed certain appeals and allowed others, setting aside the tribunal's order and restoring the order of CIT (A) granting relief to the assesses. The assessing authority was directed to pass consequential orders giving the benefit to the assesses as declared in the judgment.

Judgment

1. These appeals are preferred by the revenue challenging the order passed by the tribunal, which has upheld the deductions claimed by the assesses under Section 801B as well as under Section 80 HHC. The Tribunal in few cases did not grant the aforesaid relief and the assessee are in appeal. The question of law involved in all these appeals are one and the same, and therefore they are taken up for consideration together and disposed off by this common order.

2. The question of law that arises for consideration is as under:-

“When the deduction of profits and gains of an undertaking is allowed under Section 80 1A, whether such profits and gains has to be deducted before computation of the profits and gains under Section 80HHC or after arriving at the profits and gains of business?”

3. In order to answer the aforesaid questions, we set out hereunder the facts of one case for the proper appreciation of the legal issues involved.

4. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture and export of garments. For the assessment year 2001-2002, he filed a return of income. The assessing Officer proceeded to pass an assessment order under Section 143 (3) on 19.03.2004. The Commissioner exercising its jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act found that the order of the assessment is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. It was held that the Assessing Officer in the original assessment order has not reduced the deductions allowable under Section 801B before computing the deductions admissible under Section 80HHC as required under Section 801B (13) read with Section 801A (9) of the Act. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-do the assessment in accordance with the direction as per the order dated 30.12.2004. In terms of the directions issued, the Assessing Officer has passed on order on 14.03.2005. A perusal of the said order shows the total income declared was Rs.3,53,49,850/-. The assessee was entitled to a deduction under Section 80 1B in a sum of Rs.88,37,463/-. While calculating the benefit under Section 80 HHC, the Assessing Officer deducted the amount of Rs.88,37,463/- out of the profits of the business declared after giving other benefits under the said provision. The benefit to which the assessee is entitled under Section 80HHC was restricted to Rs.2,03,83,961/-as against Rs.2,50,52,596/- claimed by the assessee and allowed by the Assessing Officer in the earlier order at the first instance.

5. In this appeal what is in challenged is the order passed by the tribunal, which set aside the order passed in revision and restoring the original order granting the benefit of deductions of Rs.2,50,52,596/-.

6. The order dated 19-3-2004 discloses the total profits of the business declared by the assessee was Rs.3,53,49,850/-. The admissible deduction under Section 801B as claimed was Rs.88,37,463/-. The assesses claimed a deduction of Rs.2,50,52,596/-under Section 80HHC. Both of which out together is less than the gross total income. Therefore he claimed complete deduction of the aforesaid amounts from profits of the business’ which was granted by the assessing authority. The Assessing Officer allowed the aforesaid deductions and arrived at the taxable income at Rs.14,59,791/-. In certain cases revenue has granted deduction under Section 80HHC and reduced the same for the purpose of quantifying profits under Section 801A.

7. The learned counsel appearing for the revenue did not dispute that the assessee is not entitled to the benefit both under Section 80-1A as well as Section 80-HHC to the extent mentioned in sub-section (9) of Section 80-1A. However, it was urged that once a deduction is granted under Section 80-1A, to the extent of such profits and gains the deduction given under Section 80-1A should be deducted before the computation of the profits and gains under Section 80-HHC and not after arriving at the profits and gains under that provision.

8. Chapter VI-A of the Act deals with deductions to be made


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top