D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
Veer Kumar Jain, Mysore – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bangalore – Respondent
1. Writ Petitioner claims to be a person who had acquired right, title and interest including possession in respect of different parcels of lands located in different survey numbers, in all measuring about 17 acres 21 guntas in terms of different sale deeds all dated 28.9.2001 [copy at Annexure-F series to the writ petition]. These lands were subject matter of acquisition proceedings at the instance of the Mysore Urban Development Authority [for short ‘the MUDA’] by issue of a notification under section 17 [1] of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 [for short ‘the Act’] way back in the year 1990 i.e., by the notification dated 15.3.1990.
2. The initiation of the proceedings by the MUDA had resulted in issue of a notification dated 25.4.1991 issued under section 19[1] of the act by the State Government declaring that the subject lands were required for public purpose. The proceedings so began in the year 1990 became subject matter of writ petition in WP No.10621-629/1998 by many persons amongst whom figured the vendors of the petitioner and this court quashed the notification issued under section 19[1] and 19[2] of the Act alone only for the reason that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.