SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 955

D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
A. Rajanna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Narasimha Raju, Chokka Reddy, Advocates – absent.

Judgment :-

1. Petitioners are eight in number. While the first petitioner by name A Rajanna s/o late M Anjanappa, aged about 70 years, residing at No 1973, Karnakadasa Road, Veerabhadranapalya, Doddaballapur town, Doddaballapur -561 203, Bangalore rural district, the petitioners 2 to 5 are sons of first petitioner and have residence at the same address as of their father.

2. On behalf of the five petitioners, the second petitioner, on his own and on behalf of the other petitioners as general power of attorney holder, has approached this court seeking for the following relief:

MAIN PRAYER

a. to issue a Writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari for quashing the Notice, dated: 12.03.2010, issued by the Respondents Nos. 02 and 03 in No. BANGALORE/SLAO/3378/2009-2010 as per “ANNEXURE – P”

b. to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case

INTERIM PRAYER

To pass an interim order of stay, staying the operation, effect and implementation of the impugned Notice, dated: 12.03.2010 bearing No. BANGALORE/SLAO/3378/2009-2010 at “ANNEXURE – P”

3. Under the impugned notice at Annexure-P dated 12-3-2010,







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top